IBM Cloud Pak for Integration v2021.1 Administration Practice Exam 2025: Latest Questions

An administrator is preparing an OpenShift cluster for IBM Cloud Pak for Integration and wants to ensure the foundational operator is installed so platform services and capabilities can be deployed consistently. Which component should be installed first?

A team wants a single web-based console to deploy and manage multiple integration capabilities (e.g., API management, messaging, event streams) from one place. Which Cloud Pak for Integration component provides this centralized experience?

Security requires that integration runtime pods should not run as root and must adhere to OpenShift security constraints. Which OpenShift mechanism most directly enforces this at the pod level?

After creating an integration capability custom resource (CR), the instance remains in a pending state. The administrator suspects the required operators are not installed or not healthy in the namespace. What is the best first action?

A platform team must allow application developers to create and manage Integration Server instances in their own namespaces while preventing them from administering other capabilities or cluster-wide resources. Which approach best aligns with least-privilege access control?

A company needs to use their corporate certificate authority for external TLS endpoints exposed by Cloud Pak for Integration capabilities. What is the best practice to meet this requirement?

An administrator is designing storage for stateful integration components and wants to minimize the risk of data loss during pod rescheduling or node maintenance. Which Kubernetes/OpenShift pattern should be used?

A team reports intermittent timeouts when calling an API exposed through API management. Cluster monitoring shows no CPU or memory saturation, but there are spikes in 5xx responses from the gateway pods. Which is the most appropriate next troubleshooting step?

A regulated enterprise requires strict separation of duties: platform administrators manage operators and shared services, while product teams manage only their own capability instances. The enterprise also requires that operator upgrades are controlled and auditable. Which design best supports these requirements?

After an outage, an administrator discovers that several integration runtime pods were evicted due to node pressure and later rescheduled, causing slow recovery and uneven distribution. The goal is to improve availability and predictable placement across nodes. Which Kubernetes feature is most appropriate to implement?

An administrator needs to give a developer access to only the Platform UI and the ability to view integration instances, but not change any configuration. Which access approach is most appropriate?

A team needs to expose the Cloud Pak for Integration Platform UI externally using OpenShift routing. Which Kubernetes/OpenShift resource is typically used for this purpose?

An operator reports that integration instances are running, but the Platform UI shows limited status information and missing health indicators. What is the most likely cause?

A production cluster must enforce that only images signed and sourced from the organization’s approved registry can run for Cloud Pak for Integration. Which control best addresses this requirement?

After deploying an integration capability in a new namespace, the operator pods are running but the operand pods remain in ImagePullBackOff. Other namespaces pull images successfully. What is the most likely fix?

A company requires integration runtimes to use a corporate CA bundle for outbound TLS connections (for example, to call internal HTTPS endpoints). What is the recommended approach for Cloud Pak for Integration on OpenShift?

An administrator wants to reduce the risk of noisy neighbors for high-throughput integration workloads. Which OpenShift design choice best supports predictable performance?

A team wants to automate creation of multiple similar integration instances across environments with consistent configuration and RBAC. Which approach is most aligned with Cloud Pak for Integration administration best practices?

During installation, the platform operator reports reconciliation failures due to "insufficient permissions" when creating resources in target namespaces. The operator subscription exists and the operator pod is running. What is the most likely cause?

A security audit requires end-to-end encryption for messaging traffic and strict control of who can publish/subscribe to specific topics/queues. The organization uses IBM MQ within Cloud Pak for Integration. Which combination best meets the requirement?

An administrator wants to limit which namespaces can host IBM Cloud Pak for Integration (CP4I) instances, so that only pre-approved projects are used for runtime deployments. Which approach best aligns with OpenShift/CP4I best practices?

A security team requires that sensitive configuration used by integration runtimes is not stored in plain text in custom resources and can be rotated centrally. Which Kubernetes-native mechanism should an administrator use for this requirement?

A CP4I platform instance is running, but a newly installed CP4I capability operator does not reconcile any operands in a target namespace. The operator pod is healthy. Which is the MOST likely cause?

An organization needs audit evidence showing who changed CP4I-related Kubernetes objects (for example, custom resources and Secrets) and when the changes occurred. Which solution best meets this requirement on OpenShift?

After a cluster upgrade, several CP4I operand pods remain in Pending state. Events show the scheduler cannot place the pods due to insufficient resources and anti-affinity rules. The business requires maintaining high availability while restoring service quickly. What is the BEST immediate remediation?