IBM Cloud Pak for Integration v2021.4 Solution Architect Practice Exam 2025: Latest Questions

An enterprise wants to deploy IBM Cloud Pak for Integration on Red Hat OpenShift and run multiple integration capabilities (messaging, API management, event streaming) with centralized administration. Which statement best describes the role of the Platform Navigator in this architecture?

A team must implement an API gateway pattern with developer self-service, subscription plans, and consumer onboarding. Which Cloud Pak for Integration capability best fits this requirement?

A solution requires reliable once-and-only-once delivery between systems, with support for store-and-forward messaging and transactional handling. Which capability should be selected?

A company needs to transfer very large files across long-distance networks with acceleration and strong security controls. Which integration capability is most appropriate?

An architect is designing an event-driven architecture where multiple microservices must independently consume the same events and be able to replay from a point in time for recovery. Which approach best meets these requirements?

A security team requires that API traffic be authenticated using OAuth and that client credentials never be embedded in application code. Which API Connect design best satisfies this requirement?

During an App Connect Enterprise deployment on OpenShift, integration flows intermittently fail with errors indicating the container cannot write to its work directory. The pod runs with restricted security context constraints. What is the most likely root cause?

A platform team wants to allow multiple application teams to deploy integration instances in separate namespaces while ensuring consistent configuration and reducing privilege requirements. Which approach aligns best with least privilege and operational consistency on OpenShift?

A financial institution requires end-to-end encryption for inter-service messaging and must also support message integrity and identity verification between producers and consumers. Which design best meets these requirements for MQ-based integrations?

An organization wants to standardize an enterprise integration reference architecture using Cloud Pak for Integration. Requirements include: decoupling producers/consumers, supporting both request/reply and event-driven patterns, enabling API reuse with governance, and minimizing tight coupling between legacy and new services. Which architecture best meets these requirements?

A team is new to IBM Cloud Pak for Integration and wants to expose integration capabilities to multiple projects through a single, discoverable catalog with consistent subscription management. Which capability best meets this requirement?

A solution architect needs to enforce that all externally exposed APIs use the same authentication mechanism and are protected from common threats (e.g., rate limits and basic threat protection). Where should these controls be primarily implemented?

A company wants to decouple producers and consumers using an event-driven approach. They need durable storage, consumer groups, and replay of events for new consumers. Which component is the best fit?

A bank must expose internal REST APIs externally. The security team requires mutual TLS to backend services, header/JSON threat protection, and routing based on URL patterns. Which component is most appropriate to enforce these requirements at the edge?

A company runs multiple integration runtimes (APIs, messaging, event streaming, and flows) in a shared OpenShift cluster. They want strict separation so one team cannot view or modify another team's integration resources while still using the same platform. What is the best approach?

An integration flow in App Connect must call an internal service that requires a client secret. The organization prohibits storing secrets in configuration files or within the flow. Which design is recommended?

A team is standardizing on asynchronous messaging for core transactions. They require once-and-once-only delivery semantics, persistence, and ordered processing per account. Which messaging option best matches these requirements?

During deployment of an API, calls succeed in the test environment but fail in production with 401 Unauthorized. The gateway configuration is identical, but production uses a different identity provider. What is the most likely root cause to verify first?

An enterprise wants end-to-end traceability for an order as it passes through API Connect, App Connect, and MQ-based services. They need to correlate logs/metrics across components with minimal custom code. Which approach is most appropriate?

A regulated customer requires that only approved integration assets (APIs, schemas, policies, event definitions) can be promoted to production and that changes are auditable with clear ownership and reuse. Which governance approach best satisfies this?

An organization is standardizing on an "API-first" approach and needs a central place for internal developers to discover, subscribe to, and test APIs. The solution must also support publishing different visibility levels (private vs. partner vs. public). Which Cloud Pak for Integration capability best fits this requirement?

A team runs Cloud Pak for Integration on OpenShift in multiple environments. They want a repeatable way to promote configuration changes (e.g., integration server settings, API definitions, and platform custom resources) from dev to test to prod with approvals and rollbacks. Which approach is the best practice?

A healthcare company must ensure only approved integrations can call backend APIs, and each call must be attributable to a consuming application. The company also wants to enforce throttling and collect analytics per consumer. Which design best meets these needs?

A solution uses MQ for transaction processing. During peak load, applications report occasional timeouts and operators observe many messages stuck on transmission queues. There is no evidence of disk full conditions. Which action is the most appropriate first step to isolate the root cause?

A platform team wants to reduce blast radius between different lines of business sharing the same OpenShift cluster running Cloud Pak for Integration. They require strong separation of runtime resources and administrative responsibilities while still allowing central governance. Which approach best aligns with this requirement?