IBM Cloud Pak for Integration v2021.2 Administration Practice Exam 2025: Latest Questions

An administrator is planning a new IBM Cloud Pak for Integration deployment on Red Hat OpenShift and wants to enable access to multiple capabilities (e.g., API management, messaging, event streaming) from a single landing experience with role-based access control. Which component should be installed/configured to provide this centralized access point?

A platform administrator needs to ensure that developers can create instances of integration capabilities (e.g., MQ, ACE, Event Streams) without being cluster-admin, but only within a specific namespace. What is the best practice approach?

An operations team wants to restrict external exposure of integration endpoints and only allow access via internal cluster networking. Which OpenShift service type is the most appropriate default choice for these endpoints?

A team is deciding between IBM MQ and IBM Event Streams for a new workload. The workload requires replaying historical events and multiple consumer groups processing the same stream independently. Which capability best fits these requirements?

After installing the Cloud Pak for Integration operators, the administrator cannot create an instance of a capability because the custom resource definition (CRD) is missing. Which is the most likely cause?

A security team requires all workloads to use TLS certificates issued by the company CA. For Cloud Pak for Integration capabilities that expose HTTPS endpoints, what is the recommended approach to manage these certificates in the cluster?

A namespace hosting IBM App Connect Enterprise (ACE) integration servers is experiencing CPU contention. The cluster has resources available, but the pods are not scaling or being rescheduled to relieve pressure. Which Kubernetes/OpenShift setting is most directly related to ensuring the scheduler can place pods appropriately and that resource guarantees/limits are respected?

An administrator needs to provide a consistent way to collect logs and metrics across multiple Cloud Pak for Integration capabilities for operational visibility and alerting. Which approach best aligns with OpenShift-native operational practices?

A production IBM MQ deployment on OpenShift must survive node failures without message loss and must meet strict recovery objectives. Which storage characteristic is most critical for the MQ persistent volumes used by queue managers?

After a certificate rotation, clients can no longer connect to an HTTPS endpoint exposed by a Cloud Pak for Integration capability. The route/ingress shows the updated certificate, but the pod continues to present the old certificate. What is the most likely explanation and corrective action?

An administrator needs to verify that all prerequisites for IBM Cloud Pak for Integration are met on an OpenShift cluster before installing the platform. Which approach is the most appropriate?

A team wants to isolate duties so that application developers can deploy integration instances but cannot modify the Cloud Pak for Integration platform configuration. Which OpenShift mechanism should be used to implement this requirement?

An operator reports that messages must be reliably delivered between services and that temporary network interruptions should not cause message loss. Which integration capability best fits this requirement?

After deploying an integration capability, pods remain in Pending state. The events show messages indicating that no nodes are available due to unbound PersistentVolumeClaims. What is the most likely cause?

A platform administrator wants to standardize configuration across multiple integration instances (for example, consistent labels, resource limits, and security settings) while still allowing per-instance overrides. What is the best approach?

A customer needs to expose REST APIs securely to internal and external consumers with consistent authentication, rate limiting, and developer onboarding via a portal. Which capability is primarily responsible for these functions?

An administrator is designing network segmentation so that only the API gateway and approved namespaces can reach an internal MQ service. What is the recommended OpenShift feature to enforce this at the network layer?

A Kafka-based event streaming workload experiences frequent rebalances and consumer lag spikes. The cluster is otherwise healthy, but the team notices uneven partition leadership distribution and CPU hotspots on certain brokers. What action is most appropriate to improve performance stability?

A security team requires that sensitive credentials used by integration runtimes be rotated automatically and never stored in plain text in manifests. Which design best meets this requirement in OpenShift?

A cluster uses strict pod security controls. When deploying an integration capability, the operator repeatedly reconciles but the pods fail to start due to permission errors related to running as root and writing to restricted paths. What is the best remediation strategy?

An administrator wants to give developers access to view the IBM Cloud Pak for Integration Platform UI and list instances, but prevent them from creating, editing, or deleting any integration instances. What is the best approach?

A team is deploying IBM App Connect (designer/runtime) on OpenShift through Cloud Pak for Integration. They must meet a security requirement that containers must not run as root and must use OpenShift security constraints. Which configuration best satisfies this requirement?

A user reports that they can access the Cloud Pak for Integration Platform UI, but the instances list shows "No instances" even though multiple integration instances exist in other namespaces. The user should only have read access. What is the most likely cause?

A company plans to expose APIs using API Connect within Cloud Pak for Integration. They require that the API gateway layer can scale independently from the management and analytics components due to different traffic patterns. Which architecture choice best meets this requirement?

After enabling TLS for an integration endpoint, clients start failing with certificate validation errors. Investigation shows the endpoint is presenting a certificate signed by an internal CA, but clients do not trust it. What is the best remediation?