IBM Security Verify Access V10.0 Deployment Practice Exam 2025: Latest Questions

An organization wants a highly available IBM Security Verify Access deployment for web single sign-on. They plan to place a load balancer in front of the runtime components. Which components should be deployed as multiple instances behind the load balancer to provide runtime access and policy enforcement?

A new Verify Access administrator needs to validate that a WebSEAL instance can communicate with the Policy Server after initial configuration. What is the most direct way to validate this relationship from the WebSEAL host?

A team is defining access control for a protected application in WebSEAL. They want a reusable rule that can be attached to multiple resources and managed centrally. Which Verify Access policy construct best fits this requirement?

After enabling a new junction, users report intermittent 403 responses. The administrator wants to quickly identify whether the response is generated by WebSEAL authorization decisions rather than the backend application. What is the best first troubleshooting step?

A customer wants to minimize exposure of the Policy Server and the administration interfaces. Which architecture best aligns with security best practices?

A WebSEAL junction to a backend HTTPS application is failing. The backend uses a certificate signed by an internal CA not trusted by default on the WebSEAL host. What is the recommended fix?

An organization wants to grant access to a protected URL based on LDAP group membership. They also want the rule to remain valid even if the user changes departments, as long as the group membership changes accordingly. Which approach is most appropriate?

Users can authenticate successfully through WebSEAL, but immediately after login they are redirected back to the login page in a loop. Which issue is the most likely cause?

A security team requires that privileged administrators use a separate authentication mechanism and that admin actions are auditable and segregated from standard user administration. Which design best meets this requirement in Verify Access?

After implementing an access policy change, only one of several WebSEAL instances enforces the new rule while others continue to behave as before. All instances are behind the same load balancer. What is the most likely cause and best corrective action?

An organization is designing IBM Security Verify Access (ISVA) for high availability. They want to ensure that policy decisions remain available even if one Policy Server node fails. Which design best meets this requirement?

After deploying a new Reverse Proxy instance, users report that requests intermittently fail with connection errors to the Policy Server. The Reverse Proxy host can resolve the Policy Server hostname, but the issue persists. What is the most likely next step to validate and remediate the problem?

A security team wants to ensure that administrative actions in ISVA are traceable to individual administrators and not shared accounts. Which approach is the best practice?

A company needs to protect an internal web application using ISVA Reverse Proxy. The application must see the authenticated user identity in an HTTP header. Which configuration is most appropriate?

An administrator updates access control policy, but users still experience the old behavior for several minutes. No errors appear in the Policy Server logs. What is the most likely explanation?

A deployment uses a load balancer in front of multiple Reverse Proxy instances. Users report being prompted to authenticate again when their traffic is routed to a different instance. Which load balancer behavior is the best first fix?

An administrator is hardening an ISVA Reverse Proxy that will be Internet-facing. Which change is the most appropriate security hardening action?

A Reverse Proxy junction to a backend application works when accessed directly from the Reverse Proxy host, but fails for external users. The backend requires the original Host header to match its virtual host configuration. What is the most likely junction-related adjustment?

During troubleshooting, an administrator observes that authentication succeeds, but authorization fails with a denial for users who should be allowed. Group membership is managed in LDAP and was recently reorganized. Which diagnostic path is most appropriate?

An enterprise wants to separate duties so that one team manages policy and another team manages reverse proxy instances, without giving either team full administrative control of the entire system. What is the best approach in ISVA?

A security architect is designing IBM Security Verify Access for high availability across two data centers. The requirement is that a user’s session remains valid if traffic is routed to a different Reverse Proxy instance after a load balancer failover. Which design choice best meets this requirement?

An administrator wants to add a new Reverse Proxy instance using the configuration and certificates of an existing instance to ensure consistent behavior. What is the recommended approach?

A company wants to enforce step-up authentication only when users access the /payments path of an application protected by IBM Security Verify Access. The rest of the application should use the existing single sign-on method without additional prompts. Where should this control be implemented?

After enabling mutual TLS between a Reverse Proxy and its back-end application server, users immediately start receiving 502/503 errors when accessing the protected application. The Reverse Proxy service is running. Which is the most likely cause?

An organization needs to route traffic to different back-end pools based on HTTP request attributes (such as path and headers) while keeping a single external DNS name for the application. They also want to apply centralized authentication and authorization at the edge. Which IBM Security Verify Access component best fits this requirement?