SAA-C03 Question 425
Single answerA company is building a new application that requires a scalable, durable, and cost-effective storage solution for storing log files. The logs need to be accessed occasionally for analysis but are not frequently modified. Which AWS storage service is the most suitable for this use case?
- A
Amazon S3
- B
Amazon EBS
- C
Amazon EFS
- D
AWS Snowball
Show answer and explanation
Correct answer: A
Explanation
Amazon S3 is the best choice for this scenario because it is designed for object storage, which is ideal for storing unstructured data such as log files. It offers high durability, scalability, and cost-effectiveness, making it a perfect fit for this use case. Other options like Amazon EBS and Amazon EFS are better suited for different types of workloads, while AWS Snowball is not a storage service.
- A. Correct.
Amazon S3 is an object storage service that is highly durable, scalable, and cost-effective. It is ideal for storing log files that are not frequently modified and can be accessed occasionally for analysis.
- B. Incorrect.
Amazon EBS is a block storage service primarily designed for use with EC2 instances. It is more suited for high-performance storage needs, such as databases, rather than storing log files.
- C. Incorrect.
Amazon EFS is a file storage service that is designed for applications requiring shared file systems. While it can store log files, it is more expensive and less suitable for infrequently accessed data compared to Amazon S3.
- D. Incorrect.
AWS Snowball is a data migration service designed to transfer large volumes of data to and from AWS. It is not a storage service and is not suitable for storing log files.