200-201 exam dumps

200-201 practice question 179 of 405

Cisco Cybersecurity Associate. Associate level, Cisco. Free question with the correct answer and a full explanation.

200-201 Question 179

Select 3

A security operations center (SOC) analyst is monitoring traffic in a network using a threat detection system that employs rules, signatures, and predictive AI. During the analysis, the system flags an unusual outbound connection to an unknown IP address. The flagged alert has a low confidence score. What should the analyst do to effectively validate the threat while leveraging the tools available?

  1. A

    Cross-check the flagged IP address against threat intelligence feeds to identify its reputation.

  2. B

    Ignore the alert since the confidence score is low and focus on higher priority alerts.

  3. C

    Analyze the network behavior and traffic patterns using AI-driven anomaly detection tools.

  4. D

    Modify the existing rule to lower the threshold for detecting similar behaviors in the future.

  5. E

    Review the signature database to verify if the flagged behavior matches any known threats.

Show answer and explanation

Correct answers: A, C, E

Explanation

To validate the threat effectively, the SOC analyst should use a combination of approaches: checking threat intelligence feeds for IP reputation, leveraging AI-driven tools to analyze anomalies, and cross-referencing with the signature database. These steps ensure a thorough investigation of the flagged alert, even if it initially has a low confidence score, to avoid missing potential threats.

  • A. Correct.

    Cross-checking the flagged IP against threat intelligence feeds helps determine if the IP is associated with malicious activity, providing context for validation.

  • B. Incorrect.

    Ignoring the alert is a poor practice, as even low-confidence alerts may indicate real threats. Analysts should investigate further to confirm or dismiss the threat.

  • C. Correct.

    Analyzing network behavior with AI-driven tools can identify anomalies or patterns that might not be captured by static rules or signatures, aiding in threat validation.

  • D. Incorrect.

    Modifying the existing rule without proper validation may lead to unnecessary alerts or missed detections. This step requires careful analysis before implementation.

  • E. Correct.

    Reviewing the signature database can help determine if the flagged behavior matches known threats, allowing the analyst to correlate findings with established patterns.

Timed practice exam

Take a 200-201 practice test under exam conditions

75 questions in 120 minutes, drawn from this bank, with a score report and a per-question review when you finish.

Start timed exam