Oracle Financials Cloud: Payables and Expenses 2025 Implementation Professional—Delta Advanced Practice Exam: Hard Questions 2025

After enabling several 2025 Payables features, an implementation team notices that invoices imported via FBDI are being rejected during validation with errors indicating missing required attributes on invoice lines. The same FBDI templates worked previously. The business requirement is to keep stricter controls for manually entered invoices but avoid breaking established inbound integrations. What is the best architectural approach?

A shared services center uses invoice imaging and OCR. They report that invoices with multiple distributions are frequently matched to the correct supplier and amount, but end up with incorrect distribution combinations when auto-coding is applied. This causes high rework and incorrect chargebacks. The organization wants to preserve automation but ensure distributions are derived consistently from purchasing data when available, and otherwise from supplier/site defaults with strong governance. What is the best solution design?

A multinational company enables advanced Payables controls and finds that prepayment application is failing for a subset of invoices during close. Investigation shows those invoices were created from a custom integration that sets payment terms and calculates due dates externally. The business requires centralized terms governance and accurate aging, but they also need to keep the integration for upstream invoice creation. What is the best remediation strategy?

An organization uses complex approval rules for invoices and wants to reduce approval cycle time. They plan to use newer Payables capabilities to auto-approve low-risk invoices, but must ensure that invoices with tax overrides, manual distribution changes after validation, or supplier bank account changes never bypass approvals. What is the most robust configuration approach?

A customer wants to implement Expenses with corporate cards and a new enhanced receipt capture flow. They report a persistent issue: when a user creates an expense report from card charges and attaches receipts later, some lines remain in an 'incomplete/needs attention' state and fail audit, even though receipts are attached. The business wants a design that minimizes user friction while ensuring audit rules reliably re-evaluate when receipts arrive. What should you do?

A company uses per diem and mileage with location-based rates. They also reimburse some employees in a different currency than the expense was incurred due to local payroll practices. They need correct policy enforcement, correct reimbursement amounts, and accurate accounting in the ledger currency. What configuration pattern best meets these requirements?

During a pilot of enhanced Expenses auditing, the finance team complains that legitimate expenses are being flagged due to 'duplicate' detection when employees split a hotel bill across multiple attendees or allocate across projects. They want to keep strong duplicate prevention without creating false positives in common split scenarios. What is the best advanced approach?

A customer wants to use AI-assisted invoice capture and coding to reduce manual effort. However, they have strict segregation of duties: the person who scans/creates an invoice must not be the person who approves or modifies supplier bank details. They also need traceability of AI suggestions vs. user edits for audit. Which design best satisfies these constraints?

An enterprise wants to automate exception handling for invoices that fail validation due to minor issues (for example, missing remit-to site, invalid supplier site, or tax classification). They want automation to fix what it safely can, route what it cannot to the right queue, and avoid creating unapproved changes that violate controls. What is the best approach?

A company is preparing for an audit and needs to demonstrate end-to-end compliance for employee expenses reimbursed through Payables: policy enforcement, approvals, audit outcomes, and accounting posting evidence. Auditors also request proof that changes to key configurations affecting reimbursements are controlled and traceable. What is the best way to satisfy this requirement in Oracle Financials Cloud?