Oracle Accounting Hub Cloud 2025 Implementation Professional Advanced Practice Exam: Hard Questions 2025

You are designing an Accounting Hub Cloud (AHC) implementation where multiple upstream systems (billing, treasury, and a custom loan system) feed a single corporate ledger. The business requires: (1) consistent accounting policies across sources, (2) traceability from journal lines back to each source transaction, and (3) the ability to onboard new sources with minimal changes to existing accounting logic. Which architecture best satisfies these requirements?

After go-live, users report that journals are created for inbound events but the accounting entries are missing the expected balancing segment values. The inbound data contains the correct balancing segment on each line. The issue occurs only for a subset of event classes, and only when a specific account derivation rule is used. What is the most likely configuration root cause to investigate first?

A customer wants to represent a single source transaction that can generate multiple accounting outcomes depending on context: (1) standard revenue recognition, (2) deferred revenue with later recognition, and (3) reversal on cancellation. They want to avoid duplicating event classes and keep maintenance low. Which SLA design approach is most appropriate in AHC?

You are troubleshooting why no accounting is generated for a particular event even though it appears in the accounting interface tables and shows a valid event status. The accounting program completes successfully with no errors, but the Create Accounting output shows zero journal entries for that event. Which diagnostic path is most effective and most likely to isolate the issue?

A bank feeds high-volume daily transactions into AHC. Requirements: near-real-time accounting, idempotent processing (no duplicate accounting if the same transaction is resent), and the ability to reprocess corrected transactions while maintaining an audit trail. What integration pattern best meets these requirements?

A source system sends transactions in multiple currencies. The business wants SLA to derive accounts using a mapping set keyed by transaction type and legal entity, but they also want different natural accounts depending on whether the transaction currency equals the ledger currency. The source can provide transaction currency but not ledger currency. What is the best approach?

During a phased rollout, two source systems will temporarily send overlapping transactions for the same business process. Finance requires that only one system’s transactions be accounted in AHC at a time, and switching must be possible with minimal downtime. Which control strategy is most robust?

A company needs to produce statutory financial statements by legal entity while also supporting management reporting by cost center and product. They use a single ledger with multiple segment values. They notice that some subledger-generated journals are not appearing in a management reporting hierarchy because certain segments are blank for specific event types. What is the best remediation that preserves accounting integrity and reporting flexibility?

A reconciliation team reports that drilldown from GL journals back to the source transaction intermittently fails for one source system, even though the journals exist and were created by SLA. The failures correlate with periods of very high inbound volume. What is the most likely architectural issue and best corrective action?

You inherited an AHC implementation where SLA rules are heavily customized with many overlapping conditions, and each change causes regressions in unrelated event classes. The customer wants to reduce risk and improve maintainability while keeping existing accounting outcomes stable. What is the best next step to implement as a maintenance best practice?