220-1101 Question 326
Single answerQualityA technician is evaluating two replacement LCD panels for a user's laptop. Both panels are the same size and connector type, and both function correctly when installed. The user is a graphic designer who complains that colors on the current display look washed out and inconsistent when editing photos. Which specification should the technician prioritize to select the higher-quality replacement for this user's needs?
- A
A panel with a higher color gamut and better color accuracy
- B
A panel with the highest possible glossy finish
- C
A panel with the lowest power consumption rating
- D
A panel with the fastest response time only
Show answer and explanation
Correct answer: A
Explanation
In A+ Core 1, quality-related hardware decisions should be matched to the user's workload and symptoms. For a user performing photo editing or graphic design, display quality should be evaluated in terms of color accuracy, color gamut, contrast, brightness, and panel technology rather than cosmetic traits or gaming-oriented specs. Industry best practices for creative work emphasize displays capable of reproducing a wide range of colors accurately, often validated through calibration. Manufacturer documentation for professional displays commonly lists gamut coverage such as sRGB, Adobe RGB, or DCI-P3, along with brightness and contrast specifications. In this case, prioritizing a panel with better color performance is the most appropriate way to improve quality for the user's real-world task.
- A. Correct.
Correct. For a graphic designer, display quality is strongly tied to accurate and consistent color reproduction. A panel with wider color gamut coverage and better factory calibration or color accuracy is the best choice when the complaint is washed-out and inconsistent colors. This directly addresses image editing and content creation needs.
- B. Incorrect.
Incorrect. A glossy finish can make colors appear more vibrant in some lighting conditions, but it does not improve actual color accuracy or consistency. In fact, glare and reflections can make professional design work more difficult. This is a common misconception because users may confuse perceived vividness with true display quality.
- C. Incorrect.
Incorrect. Lower power consumption may improve battery life, but it does not specifically solve the problem of poor color reproduction. For this scenario, image quality is the user's primary concern, so efficiency is secondary to the display's visual performance.
- D. Incorrect.
Incorrect. Faster response time is more relevant for gaming and motion handling, not for accurate photo editing. While response time can affect ghosting in fast-moving content, it does not address washed-out colors or poor color consistency.